A Level-based Approach to Computing Warranted Arguments in Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming

نویسندگان

  • Teresa Alsinet
  • Carlos Iván Chesñevar
  • Lluis Godo
چکیده

Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming (P-DeLP) is an argumentation framework based on logic programming which incorporates a treatment of possibilistic uncertainty at object-language level. In P-DeLP, the closure of justified conclusions is not always consistent, which has been detected to be an anomaly in the context of so-called rationality postulates for rule-based argumentation systems. In this paper we present a novel level-based approach to computing warranted arguments in P-DeLP which ensures the above rationality postulate. We also show that our solution presents some advantages in comparison with the use of a transposition operator applied on strict rules.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

evel-based Approach to Computing rranted Arguments in Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming

Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming (P-DeLP) is an argumentation framework based on logic programming which incorporates a treatment of possibilistic uncertainty at object-language level. In P-DeLP, the closure of justified conclusions is not always consistent, which has been detected to be an anomaly in the context of so-called rationality postulates for rule-based argumentation systems...

متن کامل

Computation of skeptical outputs in P-DeLP satisfying indirect consistency: a level-based approach

Recent research has identified the notion of indirect consistency as a rationality postulate that every rule-based argumentation frameworks should satisfy. Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming (PDeLP) is an argumentation framework based on logic programming which incorporates a treatment of possibilistic uncertainty at objectlanguage level, in which indirect consistency does not hold. In ...

متن کامل

A characterization of collective conflict for defeasible argumentation

In this paper we define a recursive semantics for warrant in a general defeasible argumentation framework by formalizing a notion of collective (non-binary) conflict among arguments. This allows us to ensure direct and indirect consistency (in the sense of Caminada and Amgoud) without distinguishing between direct and indirect conflicts. Then, the general defeasible argumentation framework is e...

متن کامل

RP-DeLP: a weighted defeasible argumentation framework based on a recursive semantics

In this article, we propose a recursive semantics for warranted formulas in a general defeasible logic argumentation framework by formalizing a notion of collective (non-binary) conflict among arguments. The recursive semantics for warranted formulas is based on the intuitive grounds that if an argument is rejected, then further arguments built on top of it should also be rejected. The main cha...

متن کامل

Modeling Defeasible Argumentation within a Possibilistic Logic Framework with Fuzzy Unification

Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming (P-DeLP) is a logic programming language which combines features from argumentation theory and logic programming, incorporating the treatment of possibilistic uncertainty at object-language level. This paper presents a first approach towards extending P-DeLP to incorporate fuzzy constants and fuzzy propositional variables. We focus on how to characteri...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008